Project Management

Establishing a Successful PMO
Inside This Issue

The Capability Maturity Model® Integration Processes

ADVERTISEMENT




Project Management, Six Sigma


FEATURE ARTICLE -

Establishing a Successful PMO

Implementing the Deliver Value Now Model


By Keith A. Thomas, PMP, MBA

Keith - Editor

The PMO will be established according to the PMO structure selected. As described in my previous article, the prevailing structures are Supportive, Controlling, and Directive. In this article we will discuss the recommended fourth alternative PMO structure – Deliver Value Now . The PMO structure implemented should align with the culture, project management maturity level, and readiness of the organization. Once the PMO structure has been decided upon, the performing organization can begin to carry out the steps to establish the PMO as a permanent department within the organization. We will assume that the PMO executive already received complete buy-in, commensurate authority, and pledged support from senior management. The organization can now move forward to implement the PMO. In order to progress efficiently in setting up the PMO operation it is recommended that the PMO executive consider four (4) fundamental phases for the PMO implementation life cycle:

Phase 1 – PMO Initiation
During the Initiation phase, senior management must sanction the role of the PMO based on the type of PMO structure chosen. Once the PMO is sanctioned, the PMO (project) sponsor must be identified and recognized. Sponsorship should really consist of one or more representatives of the executive management team. The PMO Charter, which clearly outlines the high-level responsibilities of the PMO, is then created and the Governance Board (or Steering Committee) is appointed to provide continuous high-level guidance and leadership to the PMO operation.
It is recommended that the PMO executive report to the Governance Board. However, this will depend on the corporate culture and the hierarchical structure of the organization. In any event, the PMO must be properly supported by upper management to be effective. The PMO Executive has the responsibility for recruiting and selecting the additional staff members for the PMO organization.

Phase 2 – PMO Planning
After PMO sponsorship, funding and initial staffing have all been secured, planning for the PMO execution begins. It is important to always consider the PMO value proposition to the organization. The PMO plan should clearly describe all the goals and objectives of the PMO operation, the services to be provided, the standards and protocols to follow, and the tools and techniques to be deployed in supporting the administrative and operational functions. Various project management information (PMIS) tools and templates will be essential infacilitating this operation with its important project, resource, and asset portfolio performance tracking, reporting, and feedback requirements.

Phase 3 – PMO Execution
Having a qualified, knowledgeable, and capable staff on the PMO team will serve to ensure a successful kick-off for the execution phase of the PMO operation. For the Deliver Value Now PMO structure, a solid well-thought out plan for execution should include ongoing skills training and orientation for project managers, and mentoring and coaching sessions to instill motivation and secure high morale among project team members. The PMO should also provide the teams the ability to identify and capitalize on delivery opportunities, while minimizing risks and potential threats to the active projects in the portfolio.

Phase 4 – PMO Closing and Continuous Improvement
The project management office is a continuous endeavor. While the project to build the PMO may come to a close, the PMO itself lives on. Conventional wisdom suggests the average period of time to implement a PMO is approximately 24 – 30 months. However, the PMO should begin to produce measurable value for the organization after the first six months of implementation and continue to do so during its lifetime. Therefore, the PMO team should continually make improvements to the PMO process after implementation. This will ensure an increasing level of quality in the services provided by the PMO as it matures and gains acceptance throughout the organization. The PMO should have positive consultative influence on senior management and respect within the organization. The Governance Board relies heavily on the PMO’s recommendations to determine a portfolio project mix that continues to meet the strategic goals of the organization, while adding measurable value through increased throughput and reduced project delivery cycle time.

Conclusion
The above discussion is clearly only a synopsis, which highlights key success factors for the process of establishing the Deliver Value Now PMO. Please remember that the suggested project duration for implementing the PMO is between 24 – 30 months, depending on the maturity of the organization, and the complexity of the active projects. The PMO deployment however, can be very smooth if experienced project management professionals (PMPs) are employed on the PMO team. Consult with the recommended references below for more detailed and/or elaborate discussions and recommendations for establishing a successful project management office for your organization.

Our next article discusses the roles and responsibilities of the PMO community stakeholders.

References:
Recommended reading for more insight and discussion on the Project management Office value proposition:
Gerald I. Kendall, PMP & Steven C. Rollins, PMP 2003; Advanced Project Portfolio Management and the PMO, J. Ross Publishing
Jean Brittingham, Aligning project Delivery for Success in a Program Management Environment, CH2M HILL
Michael Thirty, 2006; The IT PMO: What is it Really Managing? www.pmforum.org
Russ Martinelli & Jim Waddell, 2007; Program Management: A Framework for Collaboration; Program Management Academy

PROJECT MANAGEMENT DISCUSSIONS

Precursors to Implementing ITIL
Strategic Alignment with Project management

The challenges facing organizations today include how to strategically align Information technology service management with the continually growing demands of IT-related requirements, while developing effective and profitable ways to manage business processes. The answer points to creating a solid partnership between ITIL and project management. Howver, before attempting this ambitious alignment, some of the precursors to this innovative approach should be recognized:
  • Establish a Vision for Performance
  • Adopt a Top-Down Approach
  • Establish Performance Baselines
  • Dictate the Company’s Progress
  • Define Realistic Corporate Goals versus Cost
  • Establish Metrics and Milestones
  • These prerequisites are discussed further...More...


    SIX SIGMA DISCUSSIONS

    Fish Bone Diagram
    Tools and Techniques

    Six Sigma Tool "Cause and Effect Diagram" - This is a quality planning tool if used to determine what will define quality on the project. The diagram illustrates how various causes and sub-causes relate to create potential problems.
    - A creative way to look at the potential causes of a problem.
    - Stimulate thinking, organize thoughts and generate discussion.
    - Used to explore the factors that will result in a desired outcome. ...More

    Pareto Analysis
    Tools and Techniques

    Six Sigma Tool The Pareto diagram is based on the 80/20 rule - 80% of the problems will come from 20% of the work.
    - The chart presents the information being examined in its order of priority and helps focus attention on the most critical issues.
    - Prioritizes potential "causes" of the problem
    - Separates the critical few from the uncritical many.
    ...More


    ALEX OPINION

    Project Management Effectiveness
    Getting Lost in the Process

    It is said that the project manager is accountable for the outcome of the project; an implicit suggestion that the project manager should be equipped with authority commensurate to responsibility to ensure project success. Senior management of the performing organization should assign reasonable authority to the project manager to adequately manage project resources (time, labor, cost). Upper management should also show full support for the project and the project manager throughout the life of the project. Any organization that assigns responsibility without commensurate authority, as it relates to project management, invites inherent project failure. Finally, the project team should follow the lead of the project manager, and while a collaborative leadership style is always recommended, the project manager must demonstrate strong communication and decision-making skills for the duration.

    The project management hierarchy

    The project manager communicates constantly with the project sponsor and key stakeholders in order to mitigate issues, gain acceptance for deliverables and negotiate change requests impacting the project. The project manager needs real authority to effectively navigate these kinds of challenges, negotiations, and politics.